Friday, May 8, 2009

Why Karzai saying in Kabul one thing & doing in US anther thing?

President Karzai Before his visit to the United state said that he will talk with the US officials about the civilian causalities, but when he arrived in US and US forces did new Civilian Casualties in Afghanistan, he couldn’t say anything about it seem that he is under pressure and just ha said thanks for Secretary Clinton for showing concern and regrets for the civilian casualties
Below is a short brief of the secretary Clinton Speech and President Karzai Full Speech in the State Department:

SECRETARY CLINTON: Good morning, and welcome to the State Department. ..
It is a great privilege to welcome President Karzai and President Zardari. I have known President Zardari for a longer period of time, going back many years now…
And I have known President Karzai now for about seven years.
PRESIDENT KARZAI: Seven years.
SECRETARY CLINTON: I would now like to introduce President Karzai to deliver brief remarks. He will be followed by President Zardari to also deliver remarks. President Karzai.

PRESIDENT KARZAI:
Thank you very much, Madame Secretary. It's a pleasure for us, and I can speak on behalf of both Afghanistan and Pakistan at this point, to thank you and the President for giving us this unique opportunity of the presence here in the United States to discuss the issues of terrorism and of combating terrorism, and stability and peace, both in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and by consequence in the region and beyond. This initiative, I'm certain, through the implementation of the strategy outlined earlier by President Obama, will bring us the needed relief towards a better, more peaceful life in both of our countries
Madame Secretary, thank you very much for showing concern and regrets for the civilian casualties that are caused, especially for the one that was caused yesterday. We appreciate that, and we hope we can work together towards reducing and eventually completely removing the possibilities of civilian casualties as we move ahead in our war against terrorism or in our struggle against terrorism.
Madame Secretary, Afghanistan would like to assure the United States, its most valued strategic ally, and Pakistan, its neighbor, brother, friend. What I described yesterday is exactly true. Pakistan and Afghanistan are conjoined twins. Our suffering is shared, our joys are always shared. The life that we live is affected by the opportunities that we have and the lack of opportunities that occurs because of the circumstances in which we live today.
Madame Secretary, I will be very brief in my remarks. At this point, I would suffice that at occasions like today, Afghanistan will use, to the best of its possibility and ability, to deliver to the effectiveness of what we are doing together for stability and to do the right thing with regard to relations with Pakistan in bringing more confidence, more trust, and a working environment in which the two countries together can wage a more effective struggle against the menace of terrorism and the violence that radicalism causes both in Pakistan and in Afghanistan and the danger that they pose to you in America and the rest of the world.
I would request our brothers and sisters in Pakistan to count on us in the best possible manner that Afghanistan will go along in order to eventually provide a life of peace and prosperity to both countries. Now as we move ahead, there will be areas of practical work and cooperation. In that too, Afghanistan will contribute.
Madame Secretary, do have full confidence in us, as the two countries sit together, that we'll be friends with you and colleagues with you. And the journey that we have together will take us where we intend to be. And the right environment, as it is created today, I hope we'll continue to insist upon and have kept. Thank you.
SECRETARY CLINTON:
Thank you.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Because Karzai is a puppet and is in it for the money. It is time for change. It is time for Dr. Abdullah Abdullah!

Popal said...

Like it or not, the Anglo American establishment, by means of Corporate Aristocracy have controlled western government, the media and education for more then a century. So Abdolah Abdolah, or this and that all are in it for $. To be honest there is 2 way, either your with, or against it. No mater who is in front, the situation will be as it is planed. Several instruments of control are used, such as Liberalism, Zionism, Multiculturalism and other as an attack on natural Moral Order. Patriotic approach and Dreams of having a prosperous Afghanistan is a hallucinating dream in mind of Afghan citizens, who do not have power of authority, therefore favor one of their own tribal lines to achieve a sense of reality. The beast can only be defeated if afghans themselves can see the weakness in them selves which is division amongst their own tribes, and eliminating racism amongst Pashtu and Tajik.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Popal you sir are incorrect about Abdullah. Dr. Abdullah is no in it for money. He has fought for his country for years. He is in this race to make change.

Being mixed thnicity, Pashtu father and Panjshiri mother, he has no favoritism towards any ethnic parties.

I do agree with you that Afghans need to eliminate the racism.

Popal said...

My Dear friend, (Anonymous ) your argument: “Abdullah is no in it for money.” And your explanation “He has fought for his country for years.” This statement does not make a valid argument and explanation to legitimize his interest as a candidate to run for presidency.

Many have fought and many are fighting. The fact if one is sincere they must also show actions. If a person politically involved can spend more of his time overseas from his given Duty as a Minister, can not serve the people and the nation from India or other place, he must remain present at his seat to serve the nation in times of need. Secondly as my statement made enlightening the fact of (Corporate Aristocracy) Abdullah or any other person with experience in fighting for country is not capable to overcome challenges with experience in fighting. He or She must have ability first to understand the challenges of democracy in an environment dependant on Corporate Aristocracy and have shown some contingency plans to lesion part of this to have it acceptable to the culture of the Afghan People.

I see your reply as patriotic towards Abdullah and one side showing favoritism.